I typically avoid wading into fashionable-for-the-moment moral crusades, but the hysteria over children being separated from their parents at the border is ludicrous, and demonstrates the typical “facts over feelings” emotionalism that mars our immigration debate. That feel-goodism is why we’re even in this mess—if it can be characterized as such—in the first place.
Because I’ll be deemed a monster—“Won’t somebody please think of the children!“—for not unequivocally denouncing this Clinton-era policy, I’ll issue the usual, tedious disclaimers: yes, it’s all very tragic; yes, it could be handled better; yes, I would have been terrified to be separated from my parents at such a young age; etc.
Now that the genuflecting to popular pieties is out of the way, let me get to my point: this entire situation would be a non-issue if we had simply enforced our immigration laws consistently for the past thirty years. President Trump isn’t the villain here (if anything, Congress is—they can take immediate action to change the policy or come up with some alternative—but I don’t even think they’re wrong this time); rather, the villains are all those who—in the vague name of “humanity” and “human rights”—ignored illegal immigration (or, worse, actively condoned it).
Sadly, it is an issue. But what else are we to do? Years of non-enforcement have sent the implicit but clear message to potential illegal immigrants that we don’t take our own borders (and, by extension, our national sovereignty and rule of law) seriously, and that if you’re sympathetic enough, you’ll get to skip the line. Folks come up from Mexico and Central America fully expecting that, after some brief official unpleasantness, they can dissolve into the vastness of the United States and begin sending remittances back to their relatives—who may then pull up stakes and come.
Further, sneaking into the country illegally is a crime, and the United States has every right to enforce its laws, including those pertaining to immigration. Mexico, similarly, has that right—and uses it unabashedly to police its own border (or to let Central American migrants waltz through on their way to the Estados Unidos). Naturally, the punishment for breaking laws is often detainment, and the kiddies don’t join dad in his cell.
To give a common example: what happens to the children of, say, an American heroin dealer when he’s arrested and sentenced to ten years in a drug bust? His children—if they have no relatives willing or able to take them in—go into the foster care system. It’s tragic, it’s terrible, but it’s part of the price of committing a felony. No one wants it to happen, but it’s a consequence of one’s actions. This reason is why crime is so detrimental to society at large, even beyond the immediate victims.
Unfortunately, a combination of winking at immigration enforcement (“eh, come on—you won’t get deported”), feel-good bullcrap (as my Mom would call it), and Emma Lazarus Syndrome (trademarked to The Portly Politico, 2018) have contributed to the current nightmare situation. Now that an administration is in office that actually enforces the duly legislated law of the land—and at a point at which the problem has ballooned to epic proportions due to past lax enforcement—the problem is far thornier and more consumed with emotional and moral peril.
As any self-governing, self-sufficient adult understands, sometimes doing what is necessary is hard. I do feel for these children who are stripped from their parents arms (although, it should be noted, usually for only a matter of hours), but who cares about my feelings? We can have compassion for those who try to arrive here illegally, as well as their children, without attempting to take on all of their problems, and without sacrificing our national sovereignty and our laws in the process.
The United States is the most generous nation in the world—and the most prosperous—but we cannot take everyone in; to do so would not make everyone else better off, but would rather destroy what makes America the land of compassion, liberty, prosperity, and charity that it is.
***
For further reference, I recommend the following videos, the first from the brilliant Ben Shapiro, the second from Dilbert creator Scott Adams:
I’d also recommend this piece from National Review columnist Richard Lowry, which is quite good: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/illegal-immigration-enforcement-separating-kids-at-border/
And, finally, this piece from Conservative Review‘s Daniel Horowitz, which explains the true moral toll of illegal immigration—and misplaced compassion—very thoroughly: https://www.conservativereview.com/news/the-immorality-of-the-open-borders-left/
[…] I wrote about the current child separation policy—and the issue of illegal immigration more broadly. I initially thought about approaching […]
LikeLike
[…] negative publicity from the child separation policy—which Trump is also making moves to end as I write—the President is having a great […]
LikeLike
[…] worldviews that share almost entirely different philosophical and cosmological foundations. Unchecked immigration, especially from the Third World, represents another potential cultural bloc. Without time to […]
LikeLike
[…] of these posts consist of the usual arm-chair analysis: “Trump did it to distract from the child separation crisis!” and the like (if you look at the timing of the child separation crisis issue, though, it […]
LikeLike
[…] of his disregard. Now that Trump is president—and restoring the nation’s economy and national sovereignty—Will’s irrelevance as a national commentator is even further highlighted, and it seems […]
LikeLike
[…] We should not live our lives in fear, but we should govern sensibly—for example, by enforcing our national borders. In short, conservatism is rooted profoundly in reality—it responds to real threats, […]
LikeLike
[…] can only push forward its agenda for any length of time through means of coercive power (although maudlin emotional manipulation comes in handy, too, and works well with easily-manipulated “feel-good” types). […]
LikeLike
[…] and that “underprivileged” parts of the world labor in ever-worsening poverty (so, let’s just move them all here—that’ll solve […]
LikeLike
[…] such, securing the border seems like a logical, natural thing for a nation to pursue. In my mind, that includes the construction of a border […]
LikeLike
[…] junk. I’ve also considerably altered my views on immigration; at this point, I think America needs 150 milligrams of Deportemal (and a healthy dose of limiting legal immigration, […]
LikeLike
[…] since reading Pat Buchanan’s Death of the West—I’ve come to believe it is the defining crisis of this moment in American history. The debate is not, as it has been in the past, primarily around how much immigration is […]
LikeLike
[…] Yesterday, I posted about the Book of Nehemiah, and how the reconstruction of the wall around Jerusalem was a practical and symbolic form of national renewal and spiritual revival for the Israelites. I drew the obvious comparison between Nehemiah’s effort, which his enemies scorned, mocked, and undermined, and that of President Trump’s to build a border wall and to enforce immigration laws. […]
LikeLike
[…] nationalism dovetails with immigration in that enforcing immigration laws—and deporting illegal immigrants—would drive up wages for workers domestically. I would also argue that a moratorium on most […]
LikeLike
[…] Open borders and progressive politics are the real dangers to liberty and prosperity, not an unabashed nationalist in Central Europe—or one in the United States. Build the Wall, Drain the Swamp, and Leave the European Union! […]
LikeLike
[…] the prospect of returning to the moon inside of five years is exciting. Even with pressing concerns here on Earth, we should continue to look outward to our Solar System. What opportunities might it contain? […]
LikeLike
[…] immigration and open borders are huge problems, but their costs are sometimes difficult to see. Generally, Americans take a […]
LikeLike
[…] family situation goes beyond the “anchor babies” phenomenon and the child migrant crisis. Our immigration system prioritizes family members over skilled, English-speaking immigrants. […]
LikeLike
[…] immigration. Their illegality encourages ethnic cloistering. Their very presence constitutes a persistent state of lawlessness, which seems to breed further […]
LikeLike
[…] it’s the major issue facing the West today. Our leaders’ inabilities to address the crisis of immigration suggests their ineffectiveness—and, perhaps, their callous indifference to the damage […]
LikeLike
[…] “Open Borders is the Real Moral Crisis” – One of my first posts on immigration (and last week’s TBT feature), the context for this piece was the child separation policy and the faux outrage about it (notice how you never hear about this anymore?). When I wrote this piece, this issue was red-hot, and I anticipated all sorts of social justice whinging. Now that the political usefulness of child props is waning, it’s interesting to read it with fresh eyes. My basic argument is unchanged, though: we wouldn’t be dealing with child separation and the like if it we simply enforced the law. […]
LikeLike
[…] We should not live our lives in fear, but we should govern sensibly—for example, by enforcing our national borders. In short, conservatism is rooted profoundly in reality—it responds to real threats, prepares […]
LikeLike
[…] touch. Unfortunately, we’ve failed to enforce our border laws for so long that we’ve allowed this crisis to metastasize, to the detriment of American citizens and potential immigrants […]
LikeLike
[…] can only push forward its agenda for any length of time through means of coercive power (although maudlin emotional manipulation comes in handy, too, and works well with easily-manipulated “feel-good” types). […]
LikeLike
[…] shape, and that “underprivileged” parts of the world labor in ever-worsening poverty (so, let’s just move them all here—that’ll solve […]
LikeLike
[…] immigrants. Their illegality encourages ethnic cloistering. Their very presence constitutes a persistent state of lawlessness, which seems to breed further […]
LikeLike
[…] of these posts consist of the usual arm-chair analysis: “Trump did it to distract from the child separation crisis!” and the like (if you look at the timing of the child separation crisis issue, though, it seems […]
LikeLike